Post by account_disabled on Feb 25, 2024 17:25:18 GMT 10
Popularly known for her career in acting and comedy, and her participation as "Officer Ramírez" in the comedy sketch that went viral called Harina (2019), Verónica Bravo has used her convening power as a public figure to denounce that recently He was the victim of an assault in which his cell phone was stolen and later, also his life savings when they were emptied from the banking application on his cell phone.
Recently, social media giant Meta Platforms, Inc.—formerly Facebook—released its first annual human rights report ( 2022 ), following years of accusations that have pointed to the platform as a vehicle for hate speech. and inciting violence in places like India and Myanmar, according to Reuters .
Facebook's human rights report, which covers an Cell Phone Number List audit conducted in 2020 and 2021, includes a summary of a controversial assessment of the impact it has had on highly sensitive issues in India, which the company commissioned from the law firm, Foley Hoag.
However, associations and activist groups, such as Amnesty International and Human Rights Watch, have demanded that the analysis be fully exposed as they have accused Meta of not committing to the recommendations made by the rater.
What is Facebook's human rights report about?
Unsurprisingly, the controversial platform acknowledged what many of its detractors already think, commenting that Foley Hoag had noted the potential for "highlighted human rights risks" involved in Meta's services, including the "advocacy of hate that "incites hostility, discrimination or violence."
In this report, Meta describes the main human rights risks that could be present in its work, the action it is taking to mitigate the risk and some of the problems it has already encountered. Broadly speaking, she has accepted that she has dangers in terms of
The right to freedom of opinion and expression.
Privacy, life, freedom and security of the person.
Equality and non-discrimination.
Best interest of children.
Influence on electoral participation.
Likewise, the investigation concluded that it faces “criticism and possible reputational risks related to the risks of hate or discriminatory expressions by end users.”
Facebook human rights report
Facebook and its lack of responsibility
With this in mind, it is not surprising that Facebook's human rights report is alarming in its social impact and that it intensified the concerns of human rights observers about Meta's lack of public commitment to implementing the measures, according to reports Board Agenda .
Regarding the decision to only integrate certain data, Human Rights Watch researcher Deborah Brown commented that this "does not bring us any closer" to understanding the company's role in the spread of hate speech in India or the responsibilities it bears. will take to address the problem.
For example, for years, human rights organizations have spoken up about anti-Muslim hate speech that is stoking tensions in India, Meta's largest market globally by number of users.
In this sense, the concerns of the Facebook human rights report are repeated in other countries, although it is a “welcome step”, there is much more to do in terms of transparency and accountability in the sector, added Gayatri Khandhadai, of the Business & Human Rights Resource Centre. arose when she decided to make a claim to BBVA, a banking institution where she had an account with such savings, the Condusef —a decentralized organization of the Mexican government sectored to the Ministry of Finance and Credit. Public that functions as a defender of the users of any type of financial services—and the prosecutor's office, with the response so far that their request was “inadmissible.”
That is why the actress has decided to raise her voice in a video to show her indignation at such a situation, and with the aim of warning other bank users about its lack of security.
“This video is the fulfillment of the warning I gave them. "I am going to exhaust all my media resources so that all BBVA Bancomer users know that the application is easy to use, but it is not secure at all, and not only that, BBVA mocks the trust that users have in them."
What does the law say in these cases?
Legislation in Mexico indicates that financial institutions must return money in the event of unrecognized charges. According to CONDUSEF , different cases must be taken into consideration, including:
Cloning: The Bank of Mexico requires you to release the payment and return the amount of the transaction within 4 days after your claim, which does not apply if the bank verifies that the purchase was authorized with the chip on your card.
Theft or loss: The institution must respond for unrecognized charges on your credit card made during the 48 hours prior to the notification of theft or loss.
Internet fraud : If you see an unrecognized movement on your credit card, the entity has to release you from the payment and return the amount no later than the fourth banking day following your objection.
Such information is found, in fact, on a BBVA bank blog , where the institution also states that "digital banking is safe, reliable and is here to help you."
So far, as such, the company has not given a response, however, by law and by commitment from the bank itself, it should have a prompt solution.
Can the lack of response affect the bank's corporate reputation?
Definitely yes. Let us remember that corporate reputation is the set of perceptions that the various interest groups with which it relates ( stakeholders ) have about the company, both internal and external.
It is the result of the behavior developed by the company over time and describes its ability to distribute value to the aforementioned groups. When any company does not have an answer, as is the case with Verónica Bravo, in the face of an imminent emergency, people begin to doubt the security that the banking institution can provide to its clients, and the promises and commitments it has with them.
In addition to this, since she is a public figure and has media power, the echo becomes even stronger, thus causing more people to decide, for example, to withdraw their savings from the bank, choose not to open an account with it or not contract its services.
However, beyond the affected reputation, the reality is that having an assertive and prompt response is part of not only compliance with what the law and the company itself dictates, but also an act of social responsibility with one of its large groups of stakeholders. interest.
It remains to be seen whether after the announcement by Verónica Bravo, which has now gone viral on social networks, there will be a prompt response or one.
Recently, social media giant Meta Platforms, Inc.—formerly Facebook—released its first annual human rights report ( 2022 ), following years of accusations that have pointed to the platform as a vehicle for hate speech. and inciting violence in places like India and Myanmar, according to Reuters .
Facebook's human rights report, which covers an Cell Phone Number List audit conducted in 2020 and 2021, includes a summary of a controversial assessment of the impact it has had on highly sensitive issues in India, which the company commissioned from the law firm, Foley Hoag.
However, associations and activist groups, such as Amnesty International and Human Rights Watch, have demanded that the analysis be fully exposed as they have accused Meta of not committing to the recommendations made by the rater.
What is Facebook's human rights report about?
Unsurprisingly, the controversial platform acknowledged what many of its detractors already think, commenting that Foley Hoag had noted the potential for "highlighted human rights risks" involved in Meta's services, including the "advocacy of hate that "incites hostility, discrimination or violence."
In this report, Meta describes the main human rights risks that could be present in its work, the action it is taking to mitigate the risk and some of the problems it has already encountered. Broadly speaking, she has accepted that she has dangers in terms of
The right to freedom of opinion and expression.
Privacy, life, freedom and security of the person.
Equality and non-discrimination.
Best interest of children.
Influence on electoral participation.
Likewise, the investigation concluded that it faces “criticism and possible reputational risks related to the risks of hate or discriminatory expressions by end users.”
Facebook human rights report
Facebook and its lack of responsibility
With this in mind, it is not surprising that Facebook's human rights report is alarming in its social impact and that it intensified the concerns of human rights observers about Meta's lack of public commitment to implementing the measures, according to reports Board Agenda .
Regarding the decision to only integrate certain data, Human Rights Watch researcher Deborah Brown commented that this "does not bring us any closer" to understanding the company's role in the spread of hate speech in India or the responsibilities it bears. will take to address the problem.
For example, for years, human rights organizations have spoken up about anti-Muslim hate speech that is stoking tensions in India, Meta's largest market globally by number of users.
In this sense, the concerns of the Facebook human rights report are repeated in other countries, although it is a “welcome step”, there is much more to do in terms of transparency and accountability in the sector, added Gayatri Khandhadai, of the Business & Human Rights Resource Centre. arose when she decided to make a claim to BBVA, a banking institution where she had an account with such savings, the Condusef —a decentralized organization of the Mexican government sectored to the Ministry of Finance and Credit. Public that functions as a defender of the users of any type of financial services—and the prosecutor's office, with the response so far that their request was “inadmissible.”
That is why the actress has decided to raise her voice in a video to show her indignation at such a situation, and with the aim of warning other bank users about its lack of security.
“This video is the fulfillment of the warning I gave them. "I am going to exhaust all my media resources so that all BBVA Bancomer users know that the application is easy to use, but it is not secure at all, and not only that, BBVA mocks the trust that users have in them."
What does the law say in these cases?
Legislation in Mexico indicates that financial institutions must return money in the event of unrecognized charges. According to CONDUSEF , different cases must be taken into consideration, including:
Cloning: The Bank of Mexico requires you to release the payment and return the amount of the transaction within 4 days after your claim, which does not apply if the bank verifies that the purchase was authorized with the chip on your card.
Theft or loss: The institution must respond for unrecognized charges on your credit card made during the 48 hours prior to the notification of theft or loss.
Internet fraud : If you see an unrecognized movement on your credit card, the entity has to release you from the payment and return the amount no later than the fourth banking day following your objection.
Such information is found, in fact, on a BBVA bank blog , where the institution also states that "digital banking is safe, reliable and is here to help you."
So far, as such, the company has not given a response, however, by law and by commitment from the bank itself, it should have a prompt solution.
Can the lack of response affect the bank's corporate reputation?
Definitely yes. Let us remember that corporate reputation is the set of perceptions that the various interest groups with which it relates ( stakeholders ) have about the company, both internal and external.
It is the result of the behavior developed by the company over time and describes its ability to distribute value to the aforementioned groups. When any company does not have an answer, as is the case with Verónica Bravo, in the face of an imminent emergency, people begin to doubt the security that the banking institution can provide to its clients, and the promises and commitments it has with them.
In addition to this, since she is a public figure and has media power, the echo becomes even stronger, thus causing more people to decide, for example, to withdraw their savings from the bank, choose not to open an account with it or not contract its services.
However, beyond the affected reputation, the reality is that having an assertive and prompt response is part of not only compliance with what the law and the company itself dictates, but also an act of social responsibility with one of its large groups of stakeholders. interest.
It remains to be seen whether after the announcement by Verónica Bravo, which has now gone viral on social networks, there will be a prompt response or one.